• P-ISSN 0973-7200 E-ISSN 2454-8405
  • Follow us

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research


Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Year: 2023, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 8-20

Review Article

Crafting a Convincing Research Proposal: A Guide to Writing Successful Funding Applications


Writing a research proposal for funding is a crucial skill for researchers seeking to secure financial support for their projects. A well-drafted proposal can convince funding agencies about scientific, commercial and social impact of the research project and also researcher's competence and skill. However, crafting a persuasive proposal is always challenging, and many researchers struggle with where to start and how to structure the proposal. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive guide for writing a research project proposal for funding. It discusses the key elements involved in the research process and outlines the essential components of a persuasive research proposal. It provides a helpful guidance on how to hone in on a research question, pinpoint a knowledge gap, and define specific goals for the study. It also explores different research methodologies and provides guidance on how to select the most appropriate approach for a given research project. It further provides tips on how to structure the proposal effectively, including the use of clear and concise language, and the inclusion of relevant and compelling supporting evidence. In conclusion, it will serve as a thorough and practical resource for anyone looking to secure financial backing for their next research endeavor. Our endeavor is to provide invaluable tool for scientists who are applying for grants or seeking funding for their research endeavors.

Keywords: Research proposal, Well-crafted proposal, Manuscript, Writing, Comprehensive guide


  1. Bell J, Waters S. Ebook: Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. (6). (pp. 88-89) UK. McGraw-hill education . 2018.
  2. Bordage G, Dawson B. Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questionsMedical Education2003;37(4):376385. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01468.x
  3. Klopper H. The qualitative research proposalCurationis2008;31(4):6272. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v31i4.1062
  4. Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing Qualitative Research (7). (pp. 98-99) United states. SAGE Publications. 2014.
  5. Denscombe M. Research Proposals: A Practical Guide. (pp. 122-145) 2012.
  6. Büyüközkan G, Göçer F. Digital Supply Chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research. Computers in Industry2018;97:157177. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.02.010
  7. DL, Colquhoun, H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodologyImplementation science2010;5:19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  8. Baskarada S, Baškarada S. Qualitative Case Study GuidelinesDefence Science and Technology Organisation2014;19(40):125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008
  9. Bunnell G, Jr EJJ. The effect of mandated planning on plan quality: a fresh look at what makes “a good plan" Journal of the American Planning Association2011;77(4):338353. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.619951
  10. Vasanthakumari S. Writing research proposalWorld Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews2021;10(1):184190. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.10.1.0138
  11. Faff RW. A simple template for pitching research. Accounting & Finance2015;55:311347. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12116
  12. Gratton C, Jones a. Research methods for sports studies (2). (pp. 55-56) New York. Routledge. 2010.
  13. Belgrave LL, Zablotsky D, Guadagno MA. How do we Talk to Each other? Writing Qualitative Research for Quantitative ReadersQualitative Health Research2002;12(10):14271439. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238753
  14. Facione PA. Critical thinking: What it is and why it countsInsight assessment2011;1:130.
  15. Brewerton PM, Millward LJ. Organizational Research Methods: A Guide for Students and Researchers. (pp. 33-35) India. SAGE Publications. 2001.
  16. Mackenzie A, Nickerson P. The time trap: The classic book on time management. (4). (pp. 111-112) New York. AMACOM. 2009.
  17. Audretsch DB, Link AN, Scott JT. Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research. In: The Social Value of New Technology . (pp. 264-278Edward Elgar Publishing. 2019.
  18. Gitlin LN, Kolanowski A, Lyons KJ. Successful grant writing: Strategies for health and human service professionals (5). (pp. 189-190Springer Publishing Company. 2020.
  19. Eccles RG. The performance measurement manifestoHarvard business review1991;69(1):131137.
  20. Browning BA. Grant writing for dummies (5). (pp. 35-36John Wiley & Sons. 2022.
  21. Barnes BJ, Austin AE. The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s PerspectiveInnovative Higher Education2009;33(5):297315. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
  22. American Psychological Association. Publication manual. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association. 1983.
  23. Gastel B, Day RA. ABC-CLIO How to write and publish a scientific paper. 2022.
  24. West VL. Teaching Written Communication Skills in Professional Selling: The Cover LetterJournal of Marketing Education2006;28(3):205217. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475306291465
  25. Phillips E, Ebook JC. Ebook: How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors 7e (7). (pp. 55-56) 2022.
  26. Al-Riyami A. How to prepare a Research ProposalOman medical journal2008;23(2):6669. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282423/
  27. Dunn J, Steginga SK, Rosoman N, Millichap D. A Review of Peer Support in the Context of CancerJournal of Psychosocial Oncology2003;21(2):5567. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK69735/
  28. Bahadoran Z, Jeddi S, Mirmiran P, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: IntroductionInternational Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism2019;16(4):e84795. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5812%2Fijem.84795
  29. Heath M, Tynan C. Crafting a research proposal. The Marketing Review2010;10(2):147168. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/146934710X505753
  30. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research2005;15(9):12771288. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  31. Bamford J, RRD. Extensive reading activities for teaching language (7). (pp. 45-46Cambridge University Press. 2004.
  32. Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewersAnnals of Behavioral Medicine2011;42(1):113. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x
  33. Morgan CA, Sperry BR, Warner JE, Protopapas AA, Borowiec JD, Higgins LL, et al. Potential development of an intercity passenger transit system in Texas: final project reportTexas Transportation Institute. Available from: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-5930-2.pdf
  34. Baron MA. Guidelines for writing research proposals and dissertationsDivision of Educational Administration: University of South Dakota thesis
  35. Blanco MA, Gruppen LD, JARA, Uijtdehaage S, Szauter K, SJD. How to write an educational research grant: AMEE Guide No. 101Medical Teacher2016;38(2):113122. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2015.1087483
  36. JRT, PM, JE, SJS. Research methods in physical activity. In: Human kinetics (8). (pp. 124-126) 2022.
  37. Ramdhani A, Ramdhani MA, Amin AS. Writing a Literature Review Research Paper: A step-by-step approachInternational Journal of Basic and Applied Science2014;3(1):4756. Available from: https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/5129/1/08IJBAS%283%29%281%29.pdf
  38. Payne G, Payne J. Key concepts in social research. (pp. 144-189SAGE Publications, Ltd. 2004.
  39. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, Mcfarland DJ, Peckham PH, Schalk G, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meetingIEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering2000;8(2):164173. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/tre.2000.847807
  40. Fillmore CJ, Johnson CR, Petruck MR. Background to framenetInternational journal of lexicography2003;16:235250.
  41. May T, Perry B. Social research: Issues, methods and process. (pp. 101-102) 2022.
  42. Rowley J, Slack F. Conducting a literature reviewManagement Research News2004;27(6):3139.
  43. Agarwal R, Lucas JHS. The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on High-Visibility and High-Impact ResearchMIS Quarterly2005;29(3):381398.
  44. Sekaran U, Bougie R. Research methods for business: A skill building approach. (8). (pp. 88-89) 2016.
  45. Paltridge B. Thesis and dissertation writing: Preparing ESL students for researchEnglish for Specific Purposes1997;16(1):6170. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00028-2
  46. Mårtensson P, Fors U, Wallin SB, Zander U, Nilsson GH. Evaluating research: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and qualityResearch Policy2016;45(3):593603. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.009
  47. Ferguson RF, Dickens WT. Urban problems and community development. (3). (pp. 88-89Informa UK Limited. 2011.
  48. Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examplesJournal of Research in Nursing2020;25(8):652661. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  49. Travis P, Bennett S, Haines A, Pang T, Bhutta Z, Hyder AA, et al. Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development GoalsThe Lancet2004;364(9437):900906. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16987-0
  50. JKJ, Lacey FM. How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharmacy education2006;6(2):139148. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210600616218
  51. Walsh D, Downe S. Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing2005 ;50(2):204211. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
  52. Kingston W. Innovation needs patents reformResearch Policy2001;30(3):403423. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00090-1
  53. Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee SA. Design science research methodology for information systems researchJournal of Management Information Systems2007;24(3):4577. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
  54. Mcelroy LM, Ladner DP. Defining the Study Cohort: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Success in Academic SurgeryClinical Trials2014;p. 131139.
  55. Patel MX, VD, LT. Challenges in recruitment of research participantsAdvances in Psychiatric Treatment2003;9(3):229238. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.9.3.229
  56. Amankwaa L. Creating Protocols for Trustworthiness in Qualitative ResearchJournal of Cultural Diversity2016;23(3):121127. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29694754/
  57. Estrella M, Blauert J, Gonsalves J, Campilan D, Gaventa J, Guijt I, et al. Learning from change: Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation. (pp. 220-221) 2000.
  58. Mccormack B, Mccance TV. Development of a framework for person-centred nursingJournal of advanced nursing2006;56(5):472479. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x
  59. Qu SQ, Dumay J. The qualitative research interviewQualitative Research in Accounting & Management2011;8(3):238264.
  60. Bias RG, Mayhew DJ. Cost-justifying usability: An update for the Internet age. (pp. 6-9Elsevier. 2005.
  61. Pettit RR, Singer RF. Small business finance: a research agendaFinancial management1985;14(3):4760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3665059
  62. Locke LF, Spirduso WW, Silverman SJ. Proposals that work: A guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals. (6). (pp. 142-187Sage Publications. 2013.
  63. Shapiro I, Brin C, Bédard-Brûlé I, Mychajlowycz K. Verification as a strategic ritual: How journalists retrospectively describe processes for ensuring accuracyJournalism Practice2013;7(6):657673. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.765638
  64. Grover V, Jeong SR, Kettinger WJ, Teng JTC. The Implementation of Business Process ReengineeringJournal of Management Information Systems1995;12(1):109144.
  65. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The office of strategy managementHarvard Business Review2005;83(10):72. Available from: https://hbr.org/2005/10/the-office-of-strategy-management
  66. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health DisparitiesHealth Promotion Practice2006;7(3):312323. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906289376
  67. Ostrom AL, Bitner MJ, Brown SW, Burkhard KA, Goul M, Smith-Daniels V, et al. Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of ServiceJournal of Service Research2010;13(1):436. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1094670509357611


© 2023 Published by Krupanidhi College of Pharmacy. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Subscribe now for latest articles and news.