• P-ISSN 0973-7200 E-ISSN 2454-8405
  • Follow us

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Article

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Year: 2019, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 17-26

Original Article

Design and Evaluation of Controlled Release Drug Delivery System of Generic Drug

Abstract

Objective: Metoprolol succinate, an off-patent generic drug, is an ideal model drug for incorporation into an extended-release dosage form owing to its short half-life (3-7 hrs), low plasma protein binding (12%), and high solubility. The main objective of this study was to develop metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets based on the monolithic matrix technology for once-daily administration. The developed formulation has an in vitro release profile similar to the FDA approved target in vitro release profile while conforming to the USP limits. Methods: Metoprolol succinate matrix tablet formulations were prepared with different compositions employing different excipients, different polymers, and different concentration of polymers. Finally, one optimized formula with optimum hardness and coating parameters for the matrix tablet was selected and studied. Findings: Drug release from the formulated products was deemed acceptable, matching the release from the marketed formulation and falling within the limits set by the USP. Novelty: The formulations that were developed remained stable even after undergoing three months of accelerated stability studies. The manufacturing process was found to be consistent, cost-effective, and suitable for large-scale production using conventional tablet machines.

Keywords: Extended release, Metoprolol succinate, Formulation, Physical parameters, Invitro release, Stability

References

  1. Gennaro AR, . Remington: The science and practice of pharmacy. NY. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2000.
  2. Leon L, Herbert AL, Josheph LK. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3). Bombay. Varghese Publishing House. 1991.
  3. Robinson J, VHL L. Controlled drug delivery: fundamentals and applications (2). NY. Taylor & Francis. 1987.
  4. Swarbrick J, Boylan JC. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology. (Vol. 3) Taylor & Francis. 1990.
  5. Park K. Controlled drug delivery systems: past forward and future back. Journal of Controlled Release. 2014;190:3–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.054
  6. Nokhodchi A, Raja S, Patel P, Asare-Addo K. The role of oral controlled release matrix tablets in drug delivery systems. BioImpacts: BI. 2012;2(4):175–187. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648939/
  7. Liberman HA, Lachman L. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Tablets (2). (Vol. 1, pp. 332-337) New York, Basel, Hongkong. Marcel Dekker Inc. 2005.
  8. USP 32/NF27 The official compendia of standards. Rockville, MD. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2009.
  9. Nutan MT, Soliman MS, Taha EI, Khan MA. Optimization and characterization of controlled release multi-particulate beads coated with starch acetate. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2005;294(1-2):89–101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.01.013
  10. Dave VS, Haware RV, Sangave NA, Sayles M, Popielarczyk M. Drug-excipient compatibility studies in formulation development: current trends and techniques. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Formulation Design and Development (FDD) Section Newsletter. 2015;p. 9–15. Available from: https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/pharmacy_facpub/212/

Copyright

© 2018 Published by Krupanidhi College of Pharmacy. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.